Topic > Gay unions are a childish imitation of marriage

Needs no further proof; the AIDS epidemic has made it sufficiently clear that the vast majority of active homosexuals are promiscuous, and much more so than promiscuous heterosexuals. This fact alone points to the topic of this essay: the self-centeredness of the gay relationship. The fable of faithful homosexual "unions" (with its slogan: "What is the difference from heterosexual marriage, apart from the sex of the partner?") is an object of propaganda, to gain privileges from the law and acceptance within churches Christian. Already years ago, the German sociologist and homosexual activist Martin Dannecker (1978) openly admitted that "homosexuals have a different sexual nature" (HIV), that is, that the variability of their partners is inherent in their sexuality. The concept of "faithful marriage" had had its use in the strategy to gain social approval for homosexuality, but now it was time to drop the smokescreen, he wrote. Perhaps it was a little premature for such honesty, because the concept of opportunistic marriage still serves emancipatory purposes, for example in the legalization of adoption by same-sex couples. So a veil of lies and a repression of unwelcome facts still cover the topic of relationships. In Germany in the 1960s and early 1970s, the well-known homosexual psychiatrist Hans Giese never failed, in any public debate or forum on homosexuality, to reiterate the concept of the "faithful and lasting partnership" (Gay) of which he would be the his life. an example. But when he committed suicide after one of his failed love affairs, the incident went almost unnoticed by the media, as it didn't exactly support the fidelity theory. Likewise, self-dramatization characterized the artistic career of...... middle of paper ......ture of the celebration of the "wedding" of two Danish lesbians in a town hall. Sure, it was a pubescent show of defiance and self-assertion, but the marriage game was obvious, too. One of the two women, larger and heavier, was wearing a black groom's suit, the other, smaller and slimmer, was wearing wedding clothes. Childish disguise of male-female roles and "eternal fidelity". The craziest part, however, is that normal people act like they seriously support such a game. If they were honest with themselves, they would have to admit that their intelligence and emotions really consider it a sick joke.WORKS CITED:"Gay..." http://www.geocities.com/schwulesmuseum/gfrdse1.htm" HIV /AIDS" http://www.lse.ac.uk/Depts/lsehsc/papers/Discussion_Papers/dp10.pdfThe Male Couple http://www.usc.edu/isd/archives/oneigla/onepress/abstracts/maleyoung. html