There are many differences in defining what exactly talent is. Many theories and research have been conducted by scientists regarding the definition of talent itself. Some scientists have said that talent is the result of hard work and deliberate practice, but other scientists, in their research, say that talent is an innate ability that everyone has. Daniel Coyle, a two-time National Magazine Award finalist and contributing editor to Outside Magazine (2009, at www.thetalentcode.com), is trying to understand where talent comes from and how it grows. topic of chapter 1 of Daniel Coyle's book The Talent Code: Greatness is not born. He grew up. Here's how. In this chapter, Coyle defines talent as “the possession of repeatable skills that do not depend on physical dimension” (p. 11). He counters the general way of explaining that talent is simply a combination of genes and environment, i.e. nature and nurture (p. 14). The main idea to be conveyed by him is how to grow talent and develop skill in any discipline through deep practice. He made a smaller argument to explain more about deep practice using Bjork, the psychology professor at UCLA. “Struggling in certain purposeful ways, operating at the limits of your capabilities, making mistakes to make yourself smarter, or to put it a little differently, experiences where you are forced to slow down, make mistakes and correct them.” It also strengthens his argument. using Bjork's theory, which describes that the human brain can function efficiently through continuous testing and challenge. This method is applied when we find the "sweet spot", the point at which learning begins right point. There is an optimal gap between what you know and what you are trying to do. What talent is, what influences it, and how to cultivate it, in different ways. agreement with Coyle: talent is not born but grows. His first chapter demonstrated that deep practice can create talents. According to Gagné (2002), professor of psychology at the University of Quebec in Montreal, Canada, who developed a differentiated model. of giftedness and talent, holds that giftedness is a skill/ability that has been developed exceptionally well, while giftedness is a superior ability natural ability to perform at a level significantly higher than what one might expect of one's peers in any area of ​​human capabilities. In my opinion, any person can be born gifted, but if these gifts are not properly trained, they will not develop into fully formed talents. In this perspective, a talent implies a gift, but a gift does not automatically imply a talent.