One of several issues that has been an essential part of ethical and legal debate, leaders throughout history have sought to create utopia. Every story ends for a reason and death puts an end to every individual's dreams. Although Kurt Vonnegut's short story "Harrison Bergeron" aims to present an evidently better and perfect world, the anxiety of freedom is abandoned. Basically, the point of Utopia is that it is an impression of "ideal worlds". What I believe, the right name "Utopia" itself means "No-place" in this world. Even if we have a perfect world; there is always a person who feels something is missing. We are human, we are naturally born with imperfection. I believe that we are imperfect, utopia is a non-existent land and the author demonstrates this in his work. God created everything for a purpose, we cannot do what we want because God gave brains to human beings, which makes them unique and this makes them think differently, act and react differently. Having everyone the same seems unbelievable in planning and would not work in any way this way. If the rule were allowed to impose handicaps on natural talents, how could society ever produce developments? (“The year was 2081, and everyone was finally equal. They weren't just equal before God and the law. They were equal in every way. Nobody was smarter than anyone else. Nobody was more beautiful than anyone else. Nobody was stronger or faster than anyone else. All this equality has been due to the 211th, 212th and 213th Amendments of the Constitution and the constant caution of the agents of the Handicapper General of the United States.”) “Harrison Bergeron" by Kurt Vonnegut.The Kurt. Vonnegut proved in Harrison Bergeron that there is a perfect society and everyone has equal right to... middle of the paper... another structure that affects life Today technology is leading in everything the world in the perfect society you get all the luxury opportunities. good and bad people are everywhere; it is not possible for human being to create a perfect society , but we still cannot move the perfect society, whatever the improvement is that there are different minds in words. We wish to create a perfect society if all people were angels. The expression "utopia" does not really explain "anywhere", because the human natural world simply does not allow for excellence. As an individual being, I can create my own utopia by implementing my own responsibility and rules on myself. For the perfect society I can't do anything, but if we unite we can make a change but we still can't develop utopia; for the reason that we cannot determine the judgment of people.