Rachel () defines the important features of cultural relativism (CR) that define the complex and diverse range of moral beliefs around the world. In this way, the question of morality often defines a diversity of beliefs that cannot be generalized and/or collectivized in terms of standardizing any kind of “universal” statement: for many thinkers, this observation – “Different cultures have different moral codes ” – seemed to be the key to understanding morality. The idea of ​​universal truth in ethics, they say, is a myth. The customs of different societies are all that exists. These customs cannot be said to be “right” or “wrong” (Rachel 19). This definition of CR is important because it defines the diversity of different cultural values, which cannot simply be altered or changed to serve a dominant moral or ethical cultural paradigm. In this way, there are no “universal” statements of “correct” or “incorrect” moral conduct, but a wide range of moral beliefs that are formed in different societies. This definition of CR is important because it defines the possibility of collective morality (in global terms) and the importance of individuals (nation states, smaller societies, etc.) who may have different moral standards as a form of