However, not everyone should attend college” (Pharinet 680). This shows how Pharinet makes it clear that he agrees that education is important and that everyone has the right to attend school, but then states his argument. In this way he allows readers to understand his point of view, without however being able to question it. He then continues his argument with further knots in opposition that allow one to refine other contradictory statements to the point where one's interpretation can be unified. He points out the fact: “If college is for everyone, why do we rely on SAT scores and high school transcripts? Why don't all schools have an open admissions policy? Quite simply, because not everyone should attend university'' (Farinet 681). This example makes another valid point that supports Pharinet's argument that college may not be for everyone. It allows the reader to better understand the additional information he puts into his argument that is completely true. Nonetheless, it allows the mental processing of the argument to be understood and more detailed. It uses key components of college admissions against itself to support the theory of intelligence it uses as in test scores or results. Therefore, if you had to