12 Angry MenThe movie "12 Angry Men" is about a child who is about to be sentenced to death on suspicion of premeditated murder. During the trial, the judge tells the jury that they must reach a verdict on whether or not the boy is guilty of murdering his father. The judge was very specific when he stated that the decision must be unanimous. When they gathered in the jury room to deliberate, eleven men spoke in favor of sentencing the boy to death, but only one man rejected that sentence because he had reasonable doubts about not believing it. The first conflict they faced was over the knife. the murderer killed his victim. The evidence said it was a very rare knife that the boy had bought in a small pawn shop before going to his house and stabbing his father. On the other hand, the boy admits that he bought the knife, but it fell out of his pocket while going to the cinema. Juror No. 8 said it was possible because he bought the same knife in the same neighborhood where the boy bought the alleged killer's gun. Juror #8 was trying to say that it was possible that someone else had purchased the same type of knife to kill the target. Then Mr. Davis called a second vote, if the 11 jurors maintained their guilty view, he would join them, but if anyone else voted not guilty, they would have to find the boy innocent because the evidence was not sufficient to send the sentence. boy in the electric chair. Consensus was the best solution because after analyzing all the evidence, they called for a vote multiple times to get a final unanimous decision of not guilty. I think that when we judge a person, we can't let our emotions guide us because they won't actually lead us to the real solution to the problem. When making a group decision, it is important to consider everyone's opinion with the utmost importance and respect, so that the right decision can be made