"We do not belong to either Bangladesh or Myanmar. We have no identity in either country." - Zohra Begum (BBC) August 25, 2017, a Rohingya terrorist group ARSA attacked more than 30 police posts, killing soldiers and policemen. Then an incident continued that forced the Rohingya to flee their homes, while their villages were burned. The Rohingya crisis, where all the incidents connect to each other, leaving the thread connecting to the Rohingya migration. Rohingya accused of attacking Rakhina - ARSA - and government and soldiers' denial of killing Rohingya. It all started from an uprising by a Rohingya terrorist group demanding Rohingya rights, which led to a mass migration of Rohingya – with the loss of many people. A devastating attack occurred, injuring and taking the lives of people, leaving many people in a state of suffering. I would like to revisit the Rohingya crisis and examine the different perspectives on this case. The stakeholders involved that I would like to mention are Pope Francis and the government involved in any of these attacks. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an original essay I will mainly talk about the influences due to people's faith and the political ideology carried out by the government. "She saw. The little girl saw everything. She tried to catch her brother while he was burning. She couldn't." - Mumtaz (Rebecca Wright) Pope Francis, the current 266th pope of the Catholic Church, has shown his courage in defending the Rohingya. Although these two groups have different beliefs - religion - the pope lent a hand and gave hope to the people that there would be someone out there to help them, giving God's blessing - this is an important action taken with the pope. Pope Francis has already visited Burma and was pressured by the Catholic Church not to say any word about the Rohingya as this could spark a fire among the Burmese people as it is said to be a "forbidden word", while the United Nations organization for human rights says the opposite. In Friday's peace speech in Dhaka, Pope Francis mentioned the name 'Rohingya' for the first time, addressing Myanmar's persecuted Muslim minority. "The presence of God today is also called Rohingya", Pope Francis in the capital of Bangladesh, Dhaka. (Berlinger, et al) Although he never specifically mentioned the situation the Rohingya were in, “what was said to be the forbidden word” was said out loud in front of many people and indeed changed something. This change could affect several religious groups dealing with the Rohingya, but it might just give a bad impression to some Buddhists and perhaps a new perspective for Catholics. The Pope spoke after meeting 16 Rohingya refugees. (Tom Embury-Dennis, et al) He listened to the pain of what they went through, such as rape, murder, and loss of family. Even when pressured by the Church, Pope Francis had said a word, a word enough to get people's attention, and had done what he thought was right. And it was worth it, because the Rohingya believe that help will come from the Pope and the world, and they are still waiting. "On behalf of all those who have persecuted you, hurt you, I ask for forgiveness. I appeal to your big hearts to give us the forgiveness we ask for" - Pope Francis to Rohingya refugees. (Berlinger, et al) The Myanmar government refuses to recognize the Rohingya as citizens. This is because the Rohingya are descended from what is now called farmers"Bangladesh". But due to a military coup in 1962, the Rohingya lost their status and received foreign identity cards. (Dewan, et al) “Bangladesh also does not consider Rohingya as Bangladeshis.” (Dewan) Rohingya are sidelined because they don't know who they are and what they should be. Although a peace agreement appears to have been signed between the Rakhine Buddhists and the Rohingya Muslims, the attack still occurred. The soldiers, joined by 50 Rakhine Buddhists and non-Rohingya minorities from outside the village, began their mass killings against the Rohingya. The government denied the attack and said the target was terrorist ARSA, a Rohingya group that claimed responsibility for the August attack that killed security forces and military posts in Rakhine and left one major casualty. This targeting of ARSA has led to the burning of houses. Most of the Rohingya killed apparently belonged to the ARSA. A similar statement was made by Nobel Peace Prize winner Aung San Suu Kyi, who said: "Furthermore, the belief was expressed that those who fled did so because of affiliation with terrorist groups, and they did it to evade law enforcement" (The Guardian News) and avoided any discussion of the Rohingya, instead mentioning the safety of the Rakhine. He also appeared to blame terrorists for a “huge iceberg of misinformation.” (Angela Dewan) The government is watching carefully and cautiously towards the Rohingya - this could cause some kind of action again - and nothing has yet been revealed about who is telling the truth. The UN accused the government of a “textbook example of ethnic cleansing”. (Dewan, et al) “Action will be taken against all persons, regardless of their religion, race and political position, who go against the law of the land and violate human rights.” - Aung San Suu Kyi (Slodkowski, et al) Regarding this issue, to be honest I'm not sure exactly how I feel about it. I thought that the way the government treats the Rohingya is not acceptable after looking at what the Rohingya have experienced, but then I was worried about the terrorist group ARSA, which has done similar things in the past, attacking Rakhine like the soldiers did to the Rohingya. At this point I wasn't sure who was doing the right thing and who wasn't. Part of me says it's right for the government to be cautious about the terrorist group, but another part says there could have been another way to solve this problem other than violence. No people should be treated as if they did not exist. Everyone has an identity, and having that identity taken away from you only makes you lose pride in who you are and all rights to what you can do. The whole situation itself is really complicated for me, and I understand that there are reasons why Rohingya cannot get citizenship - military coup - and it is difficult for citizens and government to accept the whole identity called "Rohingya " which does not exist in either place. As I researched more on this topic, the more confused I became about the whole issue. There are still some unknown truths hidden, since I am not even sure whether the entire attack was planned with the sole purpose of killing terrorists and whether any of the Rohingyas who escaped from the village actually have a connection with ARSA. Please note: This is just an example. Get a custom paper from our expert writers now. Get a Custom Essay I feel like I'm wondering between ethical and ideological opinions. Also, regarding this case, it would be quite difficult for me to participate and do something. I'm still not sure which part I think is more "better" and even if I was.)