Television is undoubtedly the most used medium for information. But despite the significant role played by compelling electronics, some television programs have raised some ethical concerns, especially in the field of entertainment. This article reveals the dirty traits individuals possess to stay in power and the manipulation of journalistic integrity. To the detriment of other people, some individuals engage in all sorts of morally inappropriate actions. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an Original Essay One such television show that has earned a place on Netflix is ​​“House of Cards.” Season 1, episode one of this TV show brings the political world to the stage and captures the imagination of the viewers in a real-life situation. In season one, House of Cards, episode one, the main character of the film is Francis Underwood who brings to the fore the issue of politics, race and gender, corruption and integrity in journalism (House of Cards and Philosophy Journal, 1-2). Frank Underwood is a morally bad person who challenges the moral realism of the show. In fact, the TV show depicts him as a manipulative and murderous person. In season one, episode one of this TV show, Congressman Frank Underwood helps campaign for the president who promises him an executive position as soon as he comes to power. But unfortunately, the situation doesn't play out as expected and we see Mr. Underwood fall victim to betrayal, failing to receive the nomination as Secretary of State. That's when the drama begins to unfold with ruthless themes as "Underwood tries to use his influential position to take revenge against those who prevented him from achieving power with the help of his wife, Claire Underwood, and a political reporter Zoe Barnes." Other characters in the series with major roles in season one, episode one, are an ambitious young journalist identified as Zoe Barnes, Frank Underwood's wife identified as Claire Underwood, and Peter Russo, a congressman from Pennsylvania (Green, 1). In the first season, the main aspect that emerges is betrayal. The President, Mr. Walker, does not honor the agreement to appoint Frank as Secretary of State. Instead, nominate Senator Michael Kern. This is when Frank and his wife try to get revenge against Walker. The moral dilemma in House of Cards season one, episode one, is the manipulation and murder that occurs when Underwood tries to get close to the president with the goal of getting a cabinet. position. The first example of manipulation in episode six of the first season occurs when Congressman Peter Russo is arrested inside the car with a prostitute. The aspect of corruption and bribery emerges in this first season when Frank offers to help Peter Russo cover up the incident by bribing the police for mistaking his loyalty. Another example of manipulation occurs in episode one of the first season, when Underwood begins a symbiotic relationship with a young political journalist Zoe Barnes, to help him undermine the President's choice for Secretary of State (Green, 3). Congressman Underwood says, “Everything is about sex, except sex is about power.” He feeds false stories to the reporter against Mr. Walker to trigger his downfall, and does so because of his lust for power. In my observation, a journalist should exercise proper virtue ethics and should not allow any manipulative means to overstep the call of duty. The theory that applies to the first season of House ofCards is utilitarianism, which is a normative ethical theory that focuses on how an individual's action results in consequences that impact the entire society (Smith 453-463). Smith further suggests that we can apply the principle of utility in House of Cards to particular actions of Underwood, such as his manipulative means of getting back or the general situation.rule that includes how his influence directly affects society. According to the principle of utilitarianism, the right act is the one that produces the best results (Ladd 467-496). This policy may be used to determine the validity of the rules of conduct or moral principles of "House of Cards". Therefore, right and wrong actions are defined as following or violating those rules. For example, Underwood saw fit to generate "unjust rules" for the overall achievement of cultivated happiness at the expense of mistreatment of some individuals. "Manipulates Peter Russo to help him undermine Walker's choice for Secretary of State." Russo already knew his fate, and as Underwood drives him home, he asks, "When has your help ever helped me?" When Russo tries to come out about his connection to Underwood's plans, Underwood kills him and cites suicide as the cause of his death. It had always been his plan, to create a vacancy in political office in such a way as to influence Walker to make him Vice President. Another aspect of the utilitarian theory occurs in House of Cards, season one, episode one when a young reporter, Zoe, continues to investigate Underwood's plan. As a protective measure, Underwood lures Zoe to a secure subway station with no eyewitnesses or security cameras and pushes her onto an oncoming train. Frank breaks the rules at the cost of taking an individual's life for the sake of achieving his overall happiness. After Zoe's death, the entire team that was conducting the investigation abandons the mission, leaving Frank the privilege of continuing with his plan of manipulation. Another amazing theory we can get from “House of Cards” season one, episode four is the element of feminist ethics. Aristotle states that males are by nature superior and women inferior. Rousseau also says that women are wrong to complain about the inequality of man-made laws (Fieser and Stumpf 274-278). This isn't surprising news in House of Cards. The women in this show have suffered significantly from threats, restrictions, rape, discrimination, reduced autonomy, and even death. For example, Frank Underwood's rise to influential roles comes as a result of such exploitation. He exploits women, kills strangers so that his family can survive and also thrive in life. In the TV series "House of Cards", the first season depicts Frank's wife Claire as a co-conspirator in carrying out her husband's plan. Apparently, Claire brings the aspect of feminist ethics through the terrible things she does to other female characters. In the TV show, Claire illegally cancels a former employee's health insurance in order to deny her medicine for her fetus's needs. He does this to exploit the woman to make his wrongful termination case disappear. In another case, Claire knows that her husband is sleeping with a 22-year-old journalist with the intention of convincing her to abandon the investigation. Claire agrees with her husband's plan to destroy the young journalist, and he ultimately kills her, a condition in which Claire could have avoided protecting another woman. Another significant example of feminist ethics occurs when Claire pretends to be friends with the first lady and tells her that she is having an affair.