In this age of instant information with the support of advanced technologies, we would think that access to any data would be unlimited. After all, the Internet is at your fingertips. But the sad truth is that many countries around the world try to limit external impacts and therefore block Internet networks and censor content whenever and wherever possible. It is a platform for communication and transmission of information through universal outrage. However, despite the benefits it offers to billions of users, some obstacles force citizens and countries to move forward and practice Internet censorship. Safeguarding Internet freedom from the growth of digital dictatorship is essential to protecting the democratic system. Technology should inspire citizens to make their own social, commercial and electoral choices without coercion or hidden manipulation. We say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get Original Essay The Internet has become the ultimate sphere of public influence, and the mass media have immense power to ensure that their platforms serve public law. Laws restricting the programming of audiovisual media produced outside their own countries are reasonable in some respects and not in others. The critical question is how much information should be available on the Internet and whether there should be a restriction on certain information to be divided between followers and critics. Limiting yourself to a certain percentage of audio can reduce the influence of hate speech in society or on social media when communicating with others. The concept that all speech is the same can be proven false if discussed. For example, there are phrases or words that people use as an attempt to suppress others' right to speak. People can become targets of cyberbullying and discriminatory language, which shouldn't be the problem. These ways should not be allowed in virtual reality. In this case the process of restriction creates greater opportunities for equality. In today's world, parents are too busy juggling work and home together. But, in this technologically modernized society, they must protect their children from unhealthy inspirations. There is content everywhere on the Internet that escapes parental filters. Innocent children can become targets of predators who may engage them in child pornography or other harmful acts. Censorship allows us to protect children who get into trouble. Restricting certain information and content in the media can help reduce the amount of conflict it can create between different societies. Netflix, for example, had to remove an episode of Hasan Minhaj's Patriot Act that was critical for the country's authorities. Or there would have been a rift and Saudi Arabia would have banned the show in their country. Some restrictions are unreasonable, for example, when the government decides what information people can access, then there is no individual responsibility for their actions. Instead of being individuals, restriction turns people into products. We have already seen the impact of this censorship in China. If anyone adds anti-government, violent, or sexually explicit comments, the content will be automatically deleted. Do this multiple times and the account will be removed. It is also an invasion of privacy as it monitors all sites visited by individual users. When censorship begins to prevent any form of content because it does not imply a moral standard or offends someone, then not many commercial prospects become accessible at all stages ofsociety. Organizations can no longer advertise because their advertising might upset someone. It also closes trade for some countries. For example, Facebook is blocked in China, where it could have gained millions of users and made a profit from them. It creates a sphere where our activities are controlled by others, so those with the loudest speeches will normally have the most control. Many countries like Canada have laws that say foreign films must have artists from their country to be distributed in their country, which is a huge market for celebrities and the nation. Protecting the country's unique culture. Some states have completely blocked external media such as Korea and Cuba. Countries such as Tunisia prevent citizens from viewing revolutionary materials. Less than 40% of all residents need access to the web. I don't think restrictions on web and content access around countries will remain effective as online media and technology expand in recent years. Due to some inventions, it cannot control that users do not access specific content. For example, masking IP addresses with VPN or proxy services is the best choice for retrieving blocked content in some countries because it allows traffic to be funneled (port forwarded) through an encrypted connection and out on another side. Users can also change the DNS server on their home router. Then the remote server believes that you are logged in from the appropriate country and will simply work. The use of all these services is so widespread that it does not stop, they are difficult to track and block. Please note: this is just an example. Get a custom paper from our expert writers now. Get a Custom Essay In conclusion, culture is the soul of a nation. As countries become more economically unified, nations need strong national cultures and cultural representation to maintain their authority and sense of individuality. Undeniably, some have argued that the global impact of globalization is taking hold in the reaffirmation of local cultures. For example, television programs, music and all other content produced abroad strongly influence the culture of a foreign country and can undermine its cultural identity. But in my opinion, superior understanding of foreign culture certainly does not mean a weakening of the stature of others. Throughout history, many different traditions have grown together and created opportunities to thrive. The exchange of ideas is important for the growth of the culture or nation. We can create rules that fit the needs of the nation without imposing integrity or values ​​on others. I'm not saying that all forms of content should be allowed in society, there should be specific laws for different content depending on who can watch or listen to it. And even the introduction of restrictions is not under control due to emerging technology. Now anyone, wherever they are, can access anything available on the Internet. But it can be great if parents, government or teachers take part in teaching young people to distinguish between appropriate and inappropriate content and the importance of their own culture. Works CitedDeibert, R. J., & Rohozinski, R. (2010). Control and subversion in Russian cyberspace. In Controlled Access (pp. 137-155). MIT Press.Fung, A., Graham, M., & Weil, D. (2013). A research agenda for the civic dimensions of the digital divide. In Proceedings of the 2013 conference on computer-supported cooperative work (pp. 1427-1438). Gupta, A., & Kainth, A. (2019). Internet Censorship: Indian Scenario. International Journal of Advanced Research in Computer Science, 10(2),., 16(2), 129-142.