It is important to keep in mind that the term constitutional state differs theoretically from constitutional democracy, as well as in practice. Any form of government together with the electorate can establish a constitution. The prime example of this is totalitarian communism and its formal progressive constitution. There are many other autocratic regimes around that meet these criteria. In simple terms, even if such a system applies the laws of the constitution and follows all prescribed rules with the support of the state apparatus and courts, it is only a rule of law or rechtsstaat. It is called dictatorship and not constitutional democracy or democratic state with the rule of law at the top. There is no denying that power can only be limited by another equal power. In other words, the main factor of internal stability and balance is the division of power and mutual control according to a law approved by the national constitution. Furthermore, it is necessary to pay attention to the fact that there have been no major wars in the last 60-70 years in Europe, which is certainly due to the deep entrenchment of constitutionalism after the Second World War. It would be correct to mention the preventive effect of constitutionalism in this context as well as a strong Constitutional Court. As Helmut Steinberger stated: "... with their reputation, possibilities and competence they in themselves have a limiting effect on any attempt to act contrary to the constitution and to limit rights and freedoms." difficult form of government, regardless of whether the circumstances are favorable or not. This seems all the more difficult when the economic environment of the society is weak, the civil society is still developing and finally... middle of paper... conducts of these disorders. The main purpose of the court is to suppress totalitarianism by supporting democracy, although constitutional values ​​are severely violated. In most cases, constitutional values ​​are violated by the legislative and executive powers themselves. To minimize violations, a constitutional jurisdiction has been established that ensures democratic constitutional stability and eliminates the suppression of democratic values. Certainly one can think that the constitution and the constitutional courts are the "weapons" in the hands of power to establish mutual interests and relationships. However, constitutional law, which establishes a framework for society and its members, belongs to each and every one, who can rely on it both unwritten and written. Works Cited6. R. Maruste. The role of the Constitutional Court in democratic society. INTERNATIONAL LAW. 2007.