In any economic framework, there are three sets of choices that must be made by government bodies. What to offer, how to create and how to distribute the result of the economy. In a free market economy, the answers to all three of these types of surveys are dictated by buyers and sellers associating with each other in a free market that is not controlled by the administration or any power. On the other hand, an organized economy that is on the opposite side of a free market economy gives the legislature aggregate control over the allocation of assets, for example, the administration decides significant investment choices. However, some economists have criticized these two budget frameworks as being excessive and need to be implemented in principle. Individuals agree that we need something that sits in between these two monetary frameworks, i.e. a mixed economy. The legislator will have a part in managing the business, but all other actions will be determined by the choices of buyers and retailers (Cheung 1998). In the UK and China we have a mixed economy. Most choices are made by the commercial sector: for example, customers choose what they need to buy with their cash. Then the administration makes some choices, for example base developments, provision of prescriptions in treatment centers, etc. In general, in the United Kingdom the commercial sector chooses most of the choices in light of its abnormal effectiveness in reacting to customer inclinations. Nonetheless, to ensure social profit, pop culture administration must make some choices, for example, welfare administration, training, etc. (Department for Communities and Local Government, 2007). The thought of......half of the paper......onsequences," Working Papers, University of Venice, Department of Economics.9. Masse, LN and Barnett, WS (2002), A Benefit Cost Analysis of the Abecedarian Early Childhood Intervention. New Brunswick, NJ: National Institute for Early Education Research [online]. Available: http://nieer.org/resources/research/AbecedarianStudy.pdf[20 June 2014].10. and Knapp, M. (2007). “Economic evaluation of early intervention services”, British Journal of Psychiatry, 191, pp 19–s22.11 to reduce housing market segmentation", Regional Science. and Urban Economics, vol. 34(6), pp 727-751.12. Motiwala, SS, Gupta, S, Lilly, MB, Ungar, WJ and Coyte, PC (2009) , "The cost-effectiveness of expanding intensive behavioral intervention for all autistic children in Ontario', Health Policy, 1, 2, pp. 135–151.